The Viceroy Returns wrote: I, along with many others on here I'm guessing, have 100% no shot at any of those. For me, all of those heroes are in the 3 - 4 cover range. My highest of that batch is a 1 1 2 Jean Grey. I couldn't even dent that stupid Jean Grey match with her perfectly chosen TU attack with a 3 1 1 Ant Man. No way in hell I'll be able to beat any of these. And the 4 Star transition drought continues....
OJSP wrote: PeterGibbons316 wrote: I will beat all of these, just like I beat all the ones before. Because I'd rather take on a challenge than throw in the towel and blame the devs for my short-comings. Just an observation.. almost all of the 4*s on your list have at least 6 covers. I presume the ones already fought in the Crash of the Titans (CotT) also had at least 6? If that's the case, then congratulations to you. You're in the sweet spot of having the roster strong enough for the challenge and win usable covers from the Legendary Token. Otherwise, let's not dismiss other people's opinions simply because they're upset that their 3-4 covers 4* are struggling. Simply observing the forum and my own experience: 1. yes, under covered characters can win their challenges, depending on the cover distribution and if we got seriously lucky with the board and cascades. (I won one of them, ,when he had only 6 covers) 2. 7-8 covers (again, depending on the distribution) would allow us to level the character to 166. That's probably the minimum numbers we need to comfortably beat the challenges. Anything less would require boosts, to increase our match damage +/- to be able to use our powers quicker. Also, to survive the opponent's match damage +/- powers. So, I asked the question before CotT was introduced: who is this aimed at? I think I've found my answers now.
PeterGibbons316 wrote: I will beat all of these, just like I beat all the ones before. Because I'd rather take on a challenge than throw in the towel and blame the devs for my short-comings.
BlackSheep101 wrote: People spend hero points for boosts to win these things?
Pongie wrote: Not sure should I continue to bring more 3* to 166 (currently have 16 with most of the remaining close to fully covered/need to respec) or start saving them for 4*.