kubrick wrote: "That's not really a good analogy. A more accurate analogy would be: you signed up for Netflix and fell in love with a movie or TV show on it. And then Netflix removed that show or movie. And that happens all the time." I want to improve this anology too. if money invested in this game is compared to money subscription in NETFLIX, then rag should be consider as 100 movies (if netflix has 103 movies only), would you pay if you know that the movie storage of netflix will be decreased to 3 movies in a few hours? why i want to post this message? because when i used rag last night ( i used it a few times last night..sigh), i talked to myself: i DONT NEED SO MANY SLOTS i had spider , THOR , WOLVERINE, HULK, CAPTAIN AMERICA all maxed. it means: IF netflix told me they won't offer kubrick movies, STAR WARS, INDIANA JONES any more, why i pay for it? Looking forward for any reply. Thanks for everone in this thread again.......................
kubrick wrote: "If you actually worked at a part of a bank that dealt with fraud you would know how rubbish your posturing is. Rags was worth precisely $0 when you traded HP for him, and after the nerf he is still worth precisely $0. You have lost no money as a result of the nerf so fraud is out the window."
kubrick wrote: thank you for your support ...the first thing came to my mind when i found this nerf happed: can we change the interest rate of our bank product without annoucement? the answer is negative for sure.
i am 43 now and worked in bank business for almost 20 years. frankly speaking, i seldom know a conpany doing business like this.
i play some other android games and there are some powerful characters existing in those games. the usual way is to design a more powerful character to overide the previous one. p.s.:i like kubrick movie and watched clockwork orange several times.
zhadum wrote: kubrick wrote: "If you actually worked at a part of a bank that dealt with fraud you would know how rubbish your posturing is. Rags was worth precisely $0 when you traded HP for him, and after the nerf he is still worth precisely $0. You have lost no money as a result of the nerf so fraud is out the window." So you want to ignore that that HP may have been purchased with cash? Troll.
DumDumDugn wrote: There's definitely been worse cases of consumer fraud for virtual goods, like what Zynga did (accept cash payments towards a game they were planning on shutting down for months without telling anyone).
Eddiemon wrote: DumDumDugn wrote: There's definitely been worse cases of consumer fraud for virtual goods, like what Zynga did (accept cash payments towards a game they were planning on shutting down for months without telling anyone). I couldn't find any record of a lawsuit on this. Lots of copyright, trademark and insider trading stuff but no consumer fraud ones. If you have a reference can you let me know because these technicalities are interesting.
MarvelMan wrote: jozier wrote: A more accurate analogy would be: you signed up for Netflix and fell in love with a movie or TV show on it. And then Netflix removed that show or movie. And that happens all the time. This made me think about netflix pulling Star Wars and replacing it in their collection with Space Balls.
jozier wrote: A more accurate analogy would be: you signed up for Netflix and fell in love with a movie or TV show on it. And then Netflix removed that show or movie. And that happens all the time.
squirrel85 wrote: This is stupid. I doubt anyone here is actually a lawyer, but regardless. No one is going to sue. It's just unbelievable how the company so willingly takes our money but can't respond or forewarn for that matter when we feel something was unfair. We are being looked at in the face and too on the forums that your opinions only matter if you can make us more money, thanks and goodbye for the money already spent. I wanted to love this game, and probably would have put more money into it, but won't waste my time if I don't hear back from someone.