HulkSmash wrote: You make yourselves out to be a charitable bunch with your "support" but the fact is none of you put money into a donations pot. You saw an exploit in Rag's 2red ap ability and 'invested' in yourselves to gain an advantage over the competition then you cry why the playing field is levelled. The majority had voiced their concerns for months and I'm sure the game lost more players who didn't own a rag due to not being able to compete than the 'cheaters' who blew their money on rags red so they could end their matches before they even start. The hulk event had space for 500k players and I think it hit about 70k max which indicates there is not nearly the numbers playing that D3P want. Level the playing field = a more attractive game. An attractive game = more players join (If they join and come up against endless unbeatable Rags they leave) If they can beat Rags the same as every other character they stay and play and spend money on all characters equally instead of just rag's red! Its simple business you cretin!
jozier wrote: You're an idiot. It wasn't an exploit or cheating. You're one of the worst posters on these forums.
HulkSmash wrote: _fulu_ wrote: HulkSmash wrote: Hahahaha all you rag lovers can go suck eggs! 1. Paying to win is cheating 2. You bankers f*cked up the economy in the first place. My sympathy is non-existent! Well done D3P for listening to the fans. Rag was a big hairy bumhole! Peace! Supporting the game I enjoy is cheating, eh? Child. Through my Amiga, SNES, megadrive, PS1, Dreamcast, PC, Xbox & 360 history i never had to pay once to complete a game and you dont with this! If youre supporting the game then stop moaning like lil **** n just play!
_fulu_ wrote: HulkSmash wrote: Hahahaha all you rag lovers can go suck eggs! 1. Paying to win is cheating 2. You bankers f*cked up the economy in the first place. My sympathy is non-existent! Well done D3P for listening to the fans. Rag was a big hairy bumhole! Peace! Supporting the game I enjoy is cheating, eh? Child.
HulkSmash wrote: Hahahaha all you rag lovers can go suck eggs! 1. Paying to win is cheating 2. You bankers f*cked up the economy in the first place. My sympathy is non-existent! Well done D3P for listening to the fans. Rag was a big hairy bumhole! Peace!
itstime1234 wrote: I love the spin used on this forum that the nerf was a business move and D3 was just looking to tinykitty all the innocent buyers. Is it not just as logical to assume this was done to help enhance the game and not let one character dominate them all. This isnt lord of the rings and Rags is not the one ring, he is a character amongst a host of others. Everyone has been saying Rags is overpowering and needs to be reduced and he isnt the first character to be nerfed and won't be the last. He is still fairly strong just not insane like before. This game is about tile matching, not being able to end every game in 3 moves. Where is the skill in that.
itstime1234 wrote: Really your comments and all the others are for the goodwill of the business not because your fav character can no longer manhandle everyone else. I am sure the countless comments on I deserve a refund, this sucks for me as I wanted the all powerful rags and the numerous comments on oh we should sue were clearly for the benefit of D3 right. Spin it all you want, you are just angry that without some skill you wont be able to dominate the game anymore.
panthroq wrote: The fact of the matter is you guys bought hero points, you did not actually pay money for a Ragnarok cover. One may argue that by using the hero points to upgrade it IS paying for that wonderful red Rag. But it's very different, they are not obligated to keep a cover cemented in time because you (the special snowflake) used your purchased or earned hero points on one. They fulfilled their end of the transaction by transferring said hero points to your account for use. You chose to use the hero points to upgrade the cover. There have been other covers that have been nerfed and changed why would one ever assume a cover, would or could, be immune to the same fate? The fact is he is not 'useless' there are just other options, some (if not all) of which will probably be nerfed in the future. As stated previously in the thread, this is a puzzle tile matching game, it was clearly not intended to have a specific cover that could deal high damage for low cost (lowest cost in the game) and create tiles. I would not be surprised to learn games could be ended without making a single manual tile match. Let's face it, we've all had those perfect boards, but Rag 'created' those boards. When compared with other skills of various 3* covers one can clearly see a pattern. The covers with low AP costs scale enormously better than covers with high AP cost. It's quite obvious, it is a silly mechanic to allow some skills to scale in cost (by lowering it) while scaling in damage (increasing as the cover gains levels). Which is why the 3 most popular (end game) covers all use this mechanic (Ragnarok, spiderman, magneto). It's hard to post anything constructive in this forum because honestly I've never seen any real good support for why the covers listed above should have skills that work like that and others don't. I see people on both sides posting inflammatory comments, and as a rule those are the comments most discussed. While some people call it cheating or exploiting, others whine about semantics instead of addressing the problem. I think the Ragnarok nerf was quite good. Still a viable cover, and will still be strong in lightning rounds. Lord knows it's better than Loki...
kubrick wrote: i think the gambling theory is a good analogy. this is exactly the reason why i uninstalled the game two days ago. i like certainty. i dont do gambling. according to your gambling theory, if i put my bet on a long winning horse, i accept if he lose because someone trained a better horse, but not nerf by the horse racing company. do you ageee? business ethic exists for a long time. it is developed by so many companies in the past. the only question is :do you consider it is an important issue when doing our business.